Poor Leadership

I have to admit, I really always thought Harry Reid was kind of a douchebag. Apparently I'm right once in a while:

Well this is quite shocking:

Tim Starks of Congressional Quarterly reports that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) plans to bring the Senate’s surveillance bill up for floor debate in mid-November. That’s despite the hold that Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) plans to place on the measure — something first reported by Election Central’s Greg Sargent.

I’m a bit confused here. This just doesn’t happen. So I chatted with someone I know with extensive Hill experience, who said:

“I can’t think of one time when Harry Reid went around his own. It’s just not normal for a leader to do that to his own side. Sometimes you’ll go around Republicans, sometimes they’ll use holds to be “spoilers,” but that happens to the other guy. You just don’t do it to one of your own.”

Consider what happened when Chris Dodd introduced the Emmet Till cold case bill, which called for more money for unsolved civil rights crimes. Tom Coburn put a hold on the bill — and Reid just let it go. The bill died.

Strange set of priorities you’ve got there, Senator Reid.

I hope Dodd fights this one like hell.

Post from here.

As mentioned before, I support Dodd's hold and I think the Harry Reid is showing his colors by not supporting it. This not only shows poor leadership, but it shows deference to the people on the wrong side of this issue. If you live in Nevada, be sure to tell Reid what a jackass he is.